UK Workers Voice Rising Anxiety Over AI Job Risks

More than one in four workers in the United Kingdom are concerned that artificial intelligence could eliminate their jobs within five years, reflecting a widening gap between how employers and staff view the technology’s impact on careers. The findings underline growing uncertainty as businesses expand their use of automated systems and digital tools.
Recent workforce research reviewed by Tezons shows that a majority of UK employers have introduced or increased investment in AI systems over the past year. At the same time, many employees report that their organisations are encouraging greater use of AI powered tools in day to day work. This rapid uptake is reshaping expectations about productivity, job design and long term career prospects.
Despite corporate enthusiasm, employee sentiment is more cautious. A significant share of office based staff believe AI will deliver greater benefits to companies than to individual workers. This perception is contributing to what analysts describe as a disconnect between leadership narratives about efficiency gains and employee concerns about job security and fair value distribution.
Age appears to influence attitudes. Younger workers entering the labour market express the highest levels of anxiety about their ability to adapt to AI driven change. By contrast, older employees closer to retirement report greater confidence in their roles and skills. The difference may reflect career stage, financial stability and exposure to previous waves of technological change.
Labour market conditions add to the pressure. As hiring slows in some sectors, business leaders are increasingly turning to automation to address skills shortages rather than expanding entry level recruitment or training programmes. This shift may limit opportunities for new entrants while raising expectations for digital fluency and specialised technical skills.
AI systems are most often being used to handle routine, rules based tasks that require limited judgement. Employers report that automation in these areas can improve efficiency and help fill gaps where labour is scarce. Many workers also acknowledge productivity gains, with a large portion saying AI tools have helped them complete tasks more quickly or accurately.
However, experts caution that without clear communication and reskilling pathways, employees may struggle to see how AI enhances rather than replaces their work. Workforce data suggests most people expect AI to affect their daily responsibilities in some form, while demand for roles linked to AI systems and intelligent automation is rising sharply.
Business leaders and policymakers are increasingly aware that workforce transition will need active management. As AI technologies become more embedded across industries, the balance between productivity benefits and social stability is likely to remain a central issue for employers, governments and workers alike.
Industry impact and market implications
The divergence between employer optimism and employee concern signals a critical phase in AI adoption. Companies that fail to address workforce anxiety risk lower engagement, resistance to new systems and potential talent attrition. Transparent communication, structured training and internal mobility pathways are likely to become competitive advantages in AI intensive sectors.
From a market perspective, demand for reskilling services, digital training platforms and workforce analytics tools may accelerate as organisations seek to manage transition risks. Vendors offering AI solutions that clearly integrate human oversight and task augmentation rather than full replacement could see stronger adoption in risk sensitive industries.
The findings also point to potential regulatory and policy responses. Governments may face pressure to expand lifelong learning frameworks, support displaced workers and update labour protections to reflect AI driven job redesign. Over time, labour market polarisation could intensify, with growth in high skill AI related roles alongside contraction in routine administrative and transactional work.
For the technology sector, sustained growth in AI investment appears likely, but long term success may depend as much on workforce integration strategies as on technical performance.
















